Number of threatened and extinct species in The Netherlands
Species that decline to such an extent that their survival is threatened and species that have already gone extinct are included in the Red List.
Assembling Red Lists
Red Lists per species group are compiled approximately every ten years. Species decreasing in population size and/or in distribution range and species that have gone extinct since 1900 are included in the Red List. The Dutch Red Lists may be regarded as a national application of the IUCN Red List (IUCN 2008), but follow their own protocol, for a number of species groups, based on the Red List status per species. As a species continues to decline and becomes increasingly rare, it is assigned a more severe Red List threat category. The following threat categories are distinguished: least concern, near threatened, vulnerable, endangered, critically endangered, extinct (in this context meaning ‘extinct in The Netherlands’), and data deficient.
To date, official Red Lists of 19 species groups (pertaining to fish only for freshwater fish) have been compiled. The Red list status of each assessed species is published in the Dutch Government Gazette. For most of these 19 species groups, the Red List status of each species of native and established species in The Netherlands, for which there is enough data, has been revised and published in the Government Gazette at least twice, resulting in updated Red Lists. Only species that have reproduced for at least ten consecutive years in The Netherlands are considered. Established species are species that have reached The Netherlands with the aid of humans. Sources (below) lists the proposals for the Red Lists (most with an English summary) and the announcements in the Dutch Government Gazette, making them official. The proposal Red List Stoneflies was assembled for the first time in 2023 based on data of 2022, published in March 2024 and published in the Dutch Government Gazette in October 2024. The Red List Dragonflies is the most recently revised. Based on data of 2024 the proposal Red List was published by De Vlinderstichting (Dutch Butterfly Conservation) in October 2025, and the species were published in the Dutch Government Gazette in April 2026.
Threatened and extinct species
In each of the 19 species groups, at least one third of the species are listed in the Red List with a threatened or extinct status. In some species groups the ratio is much higher. For stoneflies this pertains to 19 out of 20 species with sufficient data (95%); for reptiles to 5 out of 7 species (71%); for mayflies 39 out of 60 (65%); for butterflies 47 out of 76 (62%); for macrofungi 1629 out of 2624 (62%); for bees 181 out of 331 (55%) and for bryophytes 389 out of 718 species (54%; see table under Download data). In the species groups stoneflies, mayflies, butterflies and bees the proportion of species that have gone extinct in The Netherlands is relatively high. Many threatened species are not protected by law.
Trend of Red List species
Periodical revisions of official Red Lists make it possible to derive trends in the numbers of threatened and extinct species over time. However, with a revision frequency of approximately ten years, such trends do not reflect the actual situation in the years between revisions. By constructing “virtual” Red Lists in the years between official Red List publications, it is possible to calculate the trend in the number of threatened species on a yearly basis (see the Red List Indicator).
Sources
- IUCN (2008). The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. International Union for Conservation of Nature, Gland.
- Arnolds, E., & Veerkamp, M. (2008). Basisrapport Rode Lijst Paddenstoelen. Nederlandse Mycologische Vereniging, Utrecht. PDF’s [Macrofungi]
- De Bruyne, R. H., Wallbrink, H., & Gmelig Meyling A. W. (2003). Bedreigde en verdwenen land- en zoetwaterweekdieren in Nederland (Mollusca). Basisrapport met voorstel voor de Rode Lijst. EIS-Nederland en ANEMOON. Leiden/Heemstede. [freshwater fish]
- Creemers, R. C. M., Van Delft, J. J. C. W., & Herder, J. E. (2023). Basisrapport Rode Lijsten Amfibieën en Reptielen volgens Nederlandse en IUCN-criteria. RAVON Rapport 2021.043.[amphibians and reptiles]
- EZ (2015). Besluit van de Staatssecretaris van Economische Zaken van 15 oktober 2015, DGAN-PDJNG / 15129301, houdende vaststelling van geactualiseerde Rode lijsten flora en fauna. Staatscourant 2015 nr. 36471. [bryophites, vascular plants, grasshoppers and crickets, freshwater fish]
- Gmelig Meyling, A. W., & Van Moorsel, G. W. N. M. (2013). Aanbevelingen voor aanpassingen Rode Lijst mariene vissen. Achtergronddocument voor het supplement bij het Basisrapport Rode Lijst Vissen. Stichting ANEMOON en Ecosub, Lisse/Heemstede. [marine fish]
- Kranenbarg, J., & Spikmans, F. (2013). Achtergronddocument Rode Lijst Vissen 2011. Zoetwatervissen. Stichting RAVON, Nijmegen. [freshwater fish]
- LNV (2004). Besluit van de Minister van Landbouw, Natuur en Voedselkwaliteit van 4 november 2004, nr. TRCJZ/2004/5727, houdende vaststelling van Rode lijsten flora en fauna. Staatscourant 2004 nr. 218. [mayflies, caddisflies, flatworms, stoneflies]
- LNV (2009). Besluit van de Minister van Landbouw, Natuur en Voedselkwaliteit van 28 augustus 2009, nr. 25344, houdende vaststelling van geactualiseerde Rode lijsten flora en fauna. Staatscourant 2009 nr. 13201. [Macrofungi]
- LNV (2017). Besluit van de Minister van Landbouw, Natuur en Voedselkwaliteit van 18 november 2017, nr. 17174206, houdende vaststelling van een geactualiseerde Rode Lijst Vogels. Staatscourant 2017 nr. 68427. [birds]
- LNV (2018). Besluit van de Minister van Landbouw, Natuur en Voedselkwaliteit van 24 april 2018 nummer 18072244, houdende vaststelling van een geactualiseerde Rode Lijst Bijen. Staatscourant 2018 nr. 24897. [bees]
- LNV (2019). Besluit van de Minister van Landbouw, Natuur en Voedselkwaliteit van 22 februari 2019, DGNVLG/19045629, houdende vaststelling van een geactualiseerde Rode Lijst Dagvlinders. Staatscourant 2019 nr. 12182. [butterflies]
- LNV (2020). Besluit van de Minister van Landbouw, Natuur en Voedselkwaliteit van 14 oktober 2020, DGNVLG/20246331, houdende vaststelling van een geactualiseerde Rode Lijst Zoogdieren. Staatscourant 2020 nr. 56788. [mammals]
- LNV (2024) HERDRUK Vaststelling van de geactualiseerde Rode Lijst Korstmossen 2024. Staatscourant 2024 nr. 7385-n1. [lichens]
- LVVN (2024) Besluit van de Staatssecretaris van Landbouw, Visserij, Voedselzekerheid en Natuur van 18-09-2024, 86650193, houdende vaststelling van een geactualiseerde Rode Lijst Zweefvliegen. Staatscourant 2024 nr. 31753. [hoverflies]
- LVVN (2024) Besluit van de Staatssecretaris van Landbouw, Visserij, Voedselzekerheid en Natuur van 18-09-2024, 86650613, houdende vaststelling van een geactualiseerde Rode Lijst Reptielen. Staatscourant 2024 nr. 31756. [reptiles]
- LVVN (2024) Besluit van de Staatssecretaris van Landbouw, Visserij, Voedselzekerheid en Natuur van 18-09-2024, 86652983, houdende vaststelling van een geactualiseerde Rode Lijst Amfibieën. Staatscourant 2024 nr. 31759. [amphibians]
- LVVN (2026) Besluit van de Minister van Landbouw, Visserij, Voedselzekerheid en Natuur van 22-04-2026, 104361036, houdende vaststelling van een geactualiseerde Rode Lijst Libellen. Staatscourant 2026 nr. 15470. [dragonflies]
- Reemer, M. (2012). Basisrapport Rode Lijst Sprinkhanen en krekels. Rapportnummer EIS2012-03. EIS Kenniscentrum Insecten, Leiden. [grasshoppers and crickets]
- Reemer, M. (2018). Basisrapport voor de Rode Lijst Bijen. Rapportnummer EIS2018-06. EIS Kenniscentrum Insecten, Leiden. [bees]
- Reemer, M., Smit, J. T., & Zeegers, T. (2024). Basisrapport voor de Rode Lijst Zweefvliegen 2023. Rapportnummer EIS2024-03. EIS Kenniscentrum Insecten, Leiden. [hoverflies]
- Siebel, H. N., Bijlsma, R. J., & Sparrius, L. B. (2013). Basisrapport voor de Rode Lijst Mossen 2012. BLWG Rapport 14. Bryologische en Lichenologische Werkgroep, Oude-Tonge. [bryophites]
- Sparrius, L. B., Odé, B., & Beringen, R. (2014). Basisrapport voor de Rode Lijst Vaatplanten 2012 volgens Nederlandse en IUCN-criteria. FLORON-rapport 57. Floristisch Onderzoek Nederland, Nijmegen. [vascular plants]
- Sparrius, L., Van der Kolk, H.-J., & Van Herk, K. (2023). Basisrapport Rode Lijst Korstmossen 2022 volgens Nederlandse en IUCN-criteria. BLWG-rapport 35. Bryologische en Lichenologische Werkgroep, Utrecht. [lichens]
- Termaat, T., & Kalkman, V. J. (2011). Basisrapport Rode Lijst Libellen volgens Nederlandse en IUCN-criteria. Rapport VS2011.05. De Vlinderstichting, Wageningen. [dragonflies]
- Tien, N., Heessen, H., Kranenbarg, J. & Trapman, B. (2016). Rode Lijst vissen 2011; Achtergronddocument Zoutwatervissen. IMARES rapport C021/16. IMARES WUR, Wageningen. [marine fish]
- Van Grunsven, R. H. A., Van ’t Bosch, J. G. & Bos-Groenendijk, G. I. (2025).
Basisrapport Rode Lijst Libellen volgens Nederlandse en IUCN-criteria.
Rapport VS2025.008. De Vlinderstichting, Wageningen. [dragonflies] - Van Kleunen, A., Foppen, R., & Van Turnhout, C. (2017). Basisrapport voor de Rode Lijst Vogels 2016 volgens Nederlandse en IUCN-criteria. Sovon-rapport 2017/34. Sovon Vogelonderzoek Nederland, Nijmegen. [birds]
- Van Norren, E., Dekker, J., & Limpens, H. 2020. Basisrapport Rode Lijst Zoogdieren 2020 volgens Nederlandse en IUCN-criteria. Rapport 2019.026. Zoogdiervereniging, Nijmegen. [mammals]
- Van Swaay, C. A. M. (2019). Basisrapport Rode Lijst Dagvlinders 2019 volgens Nederlandse en IUCN-criteria. Rapport VS2019-001, De Vlinderstichting. Wageningen. [butterflies]
- Verdonschot, P. F. M, Higler, L. W. G., Nijboer, R. C., & Van den Hoek, Tj. H. (2003). Naar een doelsoortenlijst van aquatische macrofauna in Nederland; Platwormen (Tricladida), Steenvliegen (Plecoptera), Haften (Ephemeroptera) en Kokerjuffers (Trichoptera). Alterra-rapport 858, Wageningen. [flatworms, stoneflies, mayflies, caddisflies]
Technical explanation
- Name of the data
Number of threatened and extinct species
- Description
Number of species per threat category that are extinct or threatened according to the officially confirmed Red Lists.
- Responsible institute
Statistics Netherlands
- Calculation method
The graph shows the percentage of species per species group per Red List category of the total number of considered species in the species group. The number of species per Red List threat category within a species group is copied from the most recent Red List of each species group, after the proposal Red List has become official by publication in the Dutch Government Gazette.
There is, as of yet, no proposal Red List for marine fish, only two preliminary reports (see Sources Gmelig Meyling & Van Moorsel, 2013, and Tien et al., 2016).
The Red List status of a species is determined by the actual scarcity of the species and its trend since circa 1950 (but see the proposal Red Lists of the species groups for the details regarding the exact determination of the status). This method differs from the internationally prevailing IUCN-method in which the trend over the last ten years mainly determines the Red List status of a species.
- Base table
The number of species per threat category per species group is available via Download data.
- Geographical distribution
The Netherlands
- Publication frequency
Irregular (updated when a new Red List is published in the Dutch Government Gazette)
- Remark
Versions of this indicator prior to 2024 included proposal Red Lists that had not been confirmed by publication in the Dutch Government Gazette.
Versions of this indicator prior to 2024 included comparisons with Red Lists of other countries. However, these foreign Red Lists used the IUCN method, which is not identical to the method used in The Netherlands.
- Trust code
A. The Red List status of each species has been confirmed by publication in the Dutch Government Gazette and as such counts as a ‘complete count’.
Archive of this indicator
Show more Show less
Reference of this webpage
CLO (2026). Number of threatened and extinct species in The Netherlands (indicator 1052, version 19, ), www.clo.nl. Statistics Netherlands (CBS), The Hague; PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, The Hague; RIVM National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven; and Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen.